Check out "ਅੱਤ ਦਾ ਅੰਤ "

Check out "ਅੱਤ ਦਾ ਅੰਤ "

Please visit http://gotaf.socialtwist.com/redirect?l=1fj0

http://gotaf.socialtwist.com/redirect?l=1fj1

Thank you.

Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon (Machaki)

*****

Will India Produce a 'DOCUMENT Signed by the PUNJAB'S STATES' agreeing to their Accession-merger To the alleged Indian deomcracy? Dr. Awatar Singh S

Will India Produce a 'DOCUMENT Signed by the PUNJAB'S STATES' agreeing to their Accession-merger To the alleged Indian deomcracy?

Dr. Awatar Singh Sekhon (Machaki)*

We all know and let me make it amply clear to the people of the 'annexed' Sikh State of PUNJAB, the First 'Sovereign and Secular' nation of South Asia region, 1799 to 14th March, 1849, of a Sikh monarch Ranjit Singh, never acceeded to the alleged Indian democracy of the 'Brahmins-Hindus'; the people who were 'subservient' to Afghans, Mughals, Sikhs, British, Portuguese, etc., for more than 3,500 years.

Before the 'Brahmins-Hindus' swallow the 'Sikh Nation, PUNJAB, Khalistan, they have to produce a 'Document of Accession' to the alleged Indian democracy of the Brahmins-Hindus. This 'Document', if in existence at all, has to be signed by the Sikh monarchs of all Sikh States, called, PUNJAB under India's deceitful Brahmins-Hindus occupation. Let the Sikhs see it and the international communities see it that PUNJAB of 15th August, 1947's morning and before the British agent handed over power to the 'unelected' Brahmins-Baniya clique's leadership, must reveal that all head of Sikh states, lumped together for the 'Brahmins-Hindus' convinience, signed the 'Document of Accession to their enemy Brahmins; as inscribed in the teachings of the founder of the Sikh Religion, Guru Baba Nanak Sahib. Guru Baba Nanak Sahib's teachings are amply and crystal clear in the Sikh Scripture, Guru Granth Sahib. Guru Baba Nanak Sahib's teachings were :"Mathe Tikka Terrh Dhotti Kakhaii, Hath Chhurri Jagat Kasaii." The simple meaning of the teaching is that the "Brahmin is a Butcher of our world."

The alleged Indian democracy since 1947 must show that 'under what law of the Indian Constitution 1950, it has been keeping the people of the Internationally Disputed Areas of Jammu and Kashmir under its occupation?

It must be amply clear that none of the Sikhs' elected representative to parliament has 'signed/accepted/endorsed' the Indian Constitution 1950, which makes the country as 'Republic of India (Brahmins--Hindus and their stooges).

The Sikh members of parliament, Sardar Hukam Singh, Sardar Bhupinder Singh Mann and Sirdar Kapur Singh, ICS, MLA, MP and the National (Sikh) Professor of Sikhism 'rejected' the Indian Constitution in its drafts and final forms, in 1948, 26th November, 1949, 1950 and 6th September, 1966.

It must be noted that since 15th August, 1947, the Sikhs have no 'Constitutional Rights' under the Indian Constitution.

Would the alleged Indian democracy explain to the world under what law the 'Brahmins-Hindus' alleged Indian democracy has been keeping the 'Sikh Nation, Khalistan, hostage since 15th August, 1947.

To sum up, the Sikh Nation (Landless), PUNJAB, Khalistan, Internationally Disputed Areas of Jammu and Kashmir, and other non-Brahmin and non-Hindus have to be 'sovereign' from the Slavery of deceitful Brahmins-Hindus.

Neither Sikh nor any other non-Brahmins-Hindus minority would come into the way of 'Brahmins-Hindus' (4 and 11% out of a total population of over 1.2 billion the alleged Indian democracy) to form their 'Brahminstan'. The Brahmins of Jammu and Kashmir would join the 'Brahministan', as they do not have to ask for their special rights of protection.

* Editor in Chief

International Journal of Sikh Affairs ISSN 1481-5435

*****

Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon's Participation in the Briefing Session HUMAN RIGHTS IN PAKISTAN

Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon's Participation in the Briefing Session

HUMAN RIGHTS IN PAKISTAN

Room: XXIII

Date: 24th September, 2010

Time: 15:00 - 17:00 Hrs

The sessin was on the Human Rights in Pakistan. Actually it was the 'Bashing of Pakistan'. What I could see and guess from the audience and the members of the penal, there had been quite a few people, at least more than 8 associate presumably with the the notorious Research and Analysis Wing sitting in the session and participating actively in the Briefing. My assertion gained ground when I saw two persons (Madam Srivastva and her son, Aniket). Both are well known to twist the things when any matter of the Sikhs and/or Pakistan is involved and they never participated any discussion or questions and answers period of any session. All they have been doing to make extensive use of their 'mobiles' as soon as the panel finish their presentations. One of them is virtually 'devoid' of the history of the land they come from; this is the personal experience of the writer.

Second, I saw a person named Professor Kohli, a turbaned 'Brahmin or Hindu' in 'The Sikh Identity'. For the last 10 years and ever since I have met him and watach him in the 'Briefings relating to the Sikhs of Punjab and/or Jammu and Kashmir, I have never seen him asking any questions relating to the violations of human rights of the Sikhs of the 'Landless Sikh Nation, PUNJAB, Khalistan (under the occupation of the 'Brahmins-Hindus' Incorporation and their alleged Indian democracy).

Third, I saw and believe firmly that a bunch of 25-30 school boys of Swiss schools were brought in the room to give an impression that they were NGOs and the room was full of attendees.

Once the Speakers were through their task of speaking, the following two people asked the questions relating to the occupied areas of Jammu and Kashmir by the Indian administration.

Mr Amjad from Srinagar of the Indian occupied Jammu and Kashmir addressed his concerns to the Chair. He was not at all satisfied by the way Chair handled his question. He asked for a secondary/supplementary question, but the Chair did not allow. He walked out of room in protest.

Mr Altaf Hussain Wani said that there has been no Mujahdeen in the Azad Kashmir area, as he belongs to that area. He rejected the argument of one on the panel that Pakistan is trying to deteriorate the situation in the Jammu and Kashmir. Mr Wani 'rejected' affirmatively panel's views. Rather, he said that the J&K's dispute is hanging without any solution acceptable to the people of Kashmir.

When the Chair asked is there any more questions and or comments? Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon, who had been watching the situation closely and raised his hand that he has few comments to make.

Dr Sekhon, after introducing himself, said to Chair and audience that the answer of the Kashmir's problem is very simple if you, the panel and the United Nations' Human Rights Council and the United Nations would like to resolve the problem of the Internationally Disputed Areas of Jammu and Kashmir (IDA:J & K). For the resolution of the problem, Dr Sekhon gave two examples for the problems of the Internationally Disputed Areas (Jammu and Kashmir, under Indian occupation since 1947):

1. The answer of the IDA:JK is very simple. Let the people of the IDA:J&K exercise their right of 'Self-Determination', as Canada did it for the Province of Quebec in the last 10-12 years or so, under the leadership of the late Right Honourable Pierre Elliott Trudeau and Right Honourable John Chretien. Both times, the majority opted for the integral part of Canada.

2. Third example is of the people of Puerto Rico, which had been administered by the United States government. the US administration said that the people of Puerto Rico should control their own destiny and have their 'sovereign' administration. However, the Puerto Ricans said to the US administration that they would like to be the part of the US. To resolve the problem, the United States Congress said that the people of Puerto Rico must decide in their forthcoming elections whether they would like to have their self administration, or they would like to be the part of the United States. In the elections, the Puerto Ricans demonstrated by coming out in favour to be administrated or be the part of the US. The US Congress accepted the will of the Puerto Ricans and they are the part of the United States.

3. Like above two examples the people of IDA:J&K be given to exercise their right to control their own destiny. The world will see the verdict of the people. For their Self administration, to be casting their vote to go with Pakistan, or they would like to be occupied by the 'Brahmins-Hindus' Incorporation's alleged Indian democracy.

4. Addressing to the Chair, Dr Sekhon commented and made it amply clear that the IDA:J&K is not the 'integral' part of India, as the latter has been betraying the world with disinformation and misinformation.

5. Mr Chair, armed forces role in the war period is on the front and in the peace time they belong to their barracks. India has not fight any war, neither has it diclared war against anyone. As such, Indian armed personnel must return to their barracks. These personnel have no right to live with the civilian population, as their living perpetuates lots of problems relating to destroying culture, political apparatus, and day to day life of civilians by their notorious intimidation and day to day killings of the civilians.

6. The last and not the least Mr Chair, the Indian Armed Forces Special Powers Act must the repulsed. Sooner is the better.

Thank you, Mr Chair, ladies and gentlemen.

*****

WHAT A WISHFUL THINKING? WOULD IT SUCCEED? WHERE THE PROPOSAL HAVE COME FROM? WHOSE INTERESTS LAWRENCE SOLOMON LOOKING FOR (National Post, FP 21, 11th

WHAT A WISHFUL THINKING? WOULD IT SUCCEED? WHERE THE PROPOSAL HAVE COME FROM? WHOSE INTERESTS LAWRENCE SOLOMON LOOKING FOR (National Post, FP 21, 11th September, 2010)... and MORE?

Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon (Machaki)*

The article, Break up of Pakistan FP 12 in National Post of 11th September, 2010, writtenunder the name of Lawrence Solomon is highly interesting and full of wishful thinking for

the 'Break up of Pakistan'. It is, however, not known who inspired the author to create

more problems in the world already full of intolerance, specifically in the troubled spot of

our world, South Asia. The writer is wondering whether Lawrence Solomon has ever visited and studied the history of South Asia? In the author's views, you (Solomon) are, Sir,

virtually unfamiliar with the South Asian situation and the history of the people of this

region. If you knew the history of what is called the Indian sub-continent, you would have never chosen this topic. The topic which is highly complicated and beyond the

understanding of an ordinary individual or journalist. Let me elaborate, Sir Lawrence

Solomon, that by writing on your chosen subject, you have shown that what sort of a

simpleton you are.

Before I answer your artificiality of nation brought into being by the deliberately

dismembered of East Pakistan by Indira Gandhi and her armed forces of India and East Pakistan's traitor Mujib ur Rehman, now called Bangladesh. This Bangladesh has not been able to stand on its own feet. It has not yielded a stable administration and has not been immune to military involvements. Once again you have been suggesting that 'Pakistan's floods have been an opportunity in disguise to carry out further 'dismemberment of

Pakistan.

Your the reasoning (opportunity) to 'Break up Pakistan' is but an analogy of a simpleton

like you who could think and deal with this subject. The subject which is not so simple.

Moreover, you do not have the real background of Pakistan, except what the letters P, A, K, S and Tan stand for. I feel rather pity of your understanding on whicht you have tried to base your assumption, but do not know who suggested to hatch this analogy for you. The analogy based on such a wide and distorted history (see The Sikhs: Sovereignty To Slavery by Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon, August 2010, ISBN 978-0-9811360-8-0) of Pakistan, a brainchild of yours, although your writing gives me a vague idea who might have planted

the idea in your mind, guided you in this direction or else has tried to fire his/her gun from your shoulder. Merely based on floods (maybe the man made diaster in today's advanced world and using the HAARP technology, etc.), no one could think of starting a 'scessionist movement'. Should some force work on your analogy the consequences will be unimaginable and uncalculated. Like in 1980s, the 'Brahmins-Hindus' of India tried very much to slander the Sikhs, but did not succeed. Now, the very 'Brahmins-Hindus' of India, have been playing in certain 'unknown' hands to declare themselves the 'super power' of South Asia at the expense of all South Asian nations but the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

Because of this dream and their chronic notoriousness, they have been dreaming to fulfill their dream of super power at the expense to destroy the very existence of numerous

nations, who have been struggling to regain their 'sovereignty' since the very inception of the alleged Indian democracy. To destroy the very existence of these nations, the

'Brahmins-Hindus of India had no choice but to field the idea to 'Break up Pakistan', Sir

Soloman. The 'Brahmins' have been defined as the 'Butcher of Mankind' by the founder ofthe Sikh religion in 15th century and his teachings have been inscribed in the Sikh

scripture, Guru Granth Sahib. First, these 'Brahmins-Hindus' have been playing against

the of the Landless Sikh Nation, PUNJAB (under Indian occupation, since 15th August,

1947), waged an 'Undeclared' war against the Sikhs of Punjab in the form of a brutal

military "Operation Bluestar" of June, 1984, killed more than 270,000 Sikhs indiscriminatory since 1980, turned the Sikhs' Landless Nation, PUNJAB, in a 'Concentration Camp',

and they have turned against the very existence of their traditional enemy, the Islamic

Republic of Pakistan to 'Break up (Pakistan)'. What is the yield of a crooked mind! The

crooked minds who had been 'subservient' to Afghans, Mughals, Sikhs, British,

Potuguese, etc., for more than 3500 years until the early morning hours of 15th August,

1947.

Please do not forget that if your analogy of the 'Break up of Pakistan' is followed, the

players must not forget that they will be opening the 'Pandora's Box'. The nations within

the 'Union of Nations, India' will have to be 'disintigrated' and the Sikhs of the Landless Sikh Nation, PUNJAB, the Disputed Areas of Jammu and Kashmir, 7-sister of Assam,

Manipur, Bodos, Dalits (70-75% of the total Indian population of more than 1.2 billion),

400-million hungry mouths of India who go to sleep hungry every night, 365 nights of a

year, Adivaasis/moolnivasis would have to be declared 'sovereign nations'. Only 4% Brahmins and 11% of Hindus cannot and will not 'control' the destiny of the non-Brahmins

and non-Hindus. Why should the rest of more than 85% non-Brahmins and non-Hindus

suffer in the 'chains of the Brahminica-Hindul slavery? Could you come up with any

answer to the 'Brahminical slavery of 85% non-Brahmins-Hindus, Sir Soloman? Now,

the ball is in your court whether you would propose the 'Break up of the alleged Indian

(Brahmins-Hindus) democracy or the Islamic Republic of Pakistan? Before I finish, I

would like to say that there are 15% Muslims under the 'slavery of Brahmins-Hindus';

therefore, who is kidding who?

Indeed, you may break up Pakistan if a person like 15-25% is a head of state of any

country.

Regards.

* Associate Professor (Retired), Medical Microbiology and Immunology

Director (Former), National Centre for Human Mycotic Diseases CANADA

Editor in Chief

International Journal of Sikh Affairs ISSN 1481-5435

THE SIKH FACTOR: Cofrontation between 'Brahmins-Hindus Indian democracy & People's Republic of China

Peoples’ Republic China and The ‘Brahmins-Hindus’ alleged democracy & The Sikh Factor. Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon (Machaki)

Questions have been arising whether there would be another confrontation between the 'Brahmins-Hindus' alleged Indian democracy and the Peoples' Republic of China, despite a big defeat of the alleged Indian democracy headed by the JL Nehru administration. In fact, this defeat of the alleged Indian democracy proved to be the JL Nehru's China fiasco (1962). Undoubtedly, in the present time the 'Brahmins-Hindus' (4+11% of the total population of more than 1.2 billion hungry mouths and one-third of these hungry mouths, i. e., more than 400 million mouths go to sleep hungry, every night for 365 nights of a year) military might is at least 10 times bigger than the JL Nehru's fiasco of 1960s. Let us not forget that during Nehru's fiasco, the propaganda mechanics of the state-controlled All India Radio (AIR; it should be noted that there had been no 'Doordarshan or Television propaganda' had not arrived in India or the 'Brahmins-Hindus' alleged Indian democracy) has been propagating after every 30-min news, for 24-h in a day that "our forces fought bravely and after fighting they reversed." Indeed, this was the worst defeat of the alleged Indian administration and its armed forces. The JL Nehru administration was no less than a 'head-less' chicken. And the Nehru fiasco took the toll of JL Nehru himself in 1964.

One should not forget and ignore the 'Sikh factor' (the product of the 'Brahmins-Hindus' day light 'robbery' of the divided Sikh Nation Punjab, the first 'Sovereign and Secular Sikh Nation of South Asia, 1799 to 14th March, 1849, of monarch Ranjit Singh) in the JL Nehru's China fiasco. This Sikh factor appeared when the 'Captain of the Western Command headquarters abandoned his ship before sinking'. This captain was a Kashmiri Brahmin Lt-Gen Raina, who was replaced by a Sikh as the Chief of the Western command. In this China fiasco, these had been the Sikhs, by and large, who fought with the Chinese soldiers 'fist to fist' in the mountaneous despite begin the well prepared Chinese army. The same 'Sikh factor' had been present isubsequently when the deceitful and divious 'Brahmins-Hindus' NDA waged wars against Pakistan (now the Islamic Republic of Pakistan) and during the dismemberment of East Pakistan. The very 'Sikh Factor' has not gone any where, rather it is far more active, since the time of an 'Undeclared war against the 'Landless Sikh Nation, PUNJAB, in the form of a brutal military "Operation Bluestar" of June, 1984, including the Darbar Sahib Complex, Sikhs' supreme Seat of Sikh Polity, Gurdwaras, and making the 'Landless Sikh Nation, Punjab, a 'Concentration Camp' to regard the Sikhs criminals. This 'undeclared' war on the k'Landless Sikh Nation, Punjab' took a toll of more than 270,000 innocent Sikhs between the period of 1st June, 1984 and to this day of writing. According to the reliable sources, more than 2-million Sikhs were slaughtered in the decades of 1980s and 1990s. The part of the 'Sikh factor' was tried to disappear by using by the 'Brahmins-Hindus' New Delhi administration (NDA) an 'unelected' member of parliament, i. e., Manmohan Sinh. Sinh is the card the 'Brahmins-Hindus' of the NDA has been playing actively against all non-Brahmins-Hindus minorities, including the Sikhs of the 'Landless Sikh Nation, PUNJAB'. The 'Sikh Factor' will make a tremendous effect should a military confrontation take place between the mighty armed forces of the 'Brahmins-Hindus' alleged Indian democracy and the Peoples' Republic of China. Regardless of the big heads like turbaned 'Brahmins-Hindus like Manmohan Sinh, Prakash (Hanera/Darkness) Sinh Badal, Badal's "joe boys and joe girls", the Akali Dal-Badal Private Limited Incorporation, politicians in the Congress and non-Sikh parties. The 'Sikh Factor' will demonstrate to the 'Brahmins-Hindus of the NDA, as how to keep the Sikh youth prisoners in the high security jails since 1980s, without trials and charges? How to keep the Sikhs like 'Jail Singhs and Jail Kaurs' born in jails since 1980s? The 'Sikh Factor' will become a severe 'headache' to the alleged Indian democracy of the 'Brahmins-Hindus', let there be a confrontation between the Brahmins-Hindus and the Peoples' Republic of China. The 'Brahmins-Hindus, in the author's view, are not only afraid but suspecious of the Sikhs, because they are Sikhs and they are 'law-less people and dangerous to the law-abiding 'Brahmins-Hindus. The seed planted by the 'Brahmins-Hindus' national poet, Rabindernath Tagore. This person used to share his mistress with the 'Brahmins-Hindus' father, MK Gandhi.

Besides the 'Sikh Factor', there will be other headaches for the 'Brahmins-Hindus' alleged Indian democracy. For example, the people of the Internationally Disputed Areas of Jammu and Kashmir, who have been suffering for more than 63-years; for example, rapes, torture, impunity, staged-encounters, genocide, burning of houses, gross violations of human rights by the armed forces kept to keep the Kashmiris mouth shut with their intimidation. For their dirty work, turbaned 'Brahmins-Hindus' in 'The Sikh Identity' and Muslims are widely used in the 'Task Force for the occupied Jammu and Kashmir'.

Besides the 'Sikh Factor' and the chronic problems of the Internationally Disputed Areas of Jammu and Kashmir, other sufferers are non-Brahmin minorities of Assam, 7-sister of Assam, Manipur, Christians, Dalits, Adivaasis/Moolnivaasis, etc.

The 'Sikh Factor' is aware that the 'Brahmins-Hindus' of the alleged Indian democracy cannot and will not find passage to wage another war by its mighty armed forces on the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, through the 'Landless Sikh Nation, PUNJAB'.

The Players in the 'Brahmins-Hindus' alleged democracy and the Peoples' Republic of China Conflict: In addition to these two players, there might be several other interests involved to incite the 'Brahmins-Hindus' NDA to look after the 'unknown' players. These players do not know despite having mighty military machines, the 'Brahmins-Hindus' are as weak as their mighty armed forces lacking the Sikhs' presence. This is probably due to their track records that (i) they had been 'subservient' up until 14th August, 1947, to the Afghans, Mughals, Sikhs, British, Portuguese, etc., (ii) they have no courage to fight even possessing their intercontinental balastic missle system, and (iii) their highly poor skills in the battlefield. The prime examples are the JL Nehru's fiasco of China (1962) and the dismemberment of East Pakistan.

The 'Brahmins-Hindus' armed forces problems are further complicated by 'insulting' the 'initiated/Amritdhari' Sikhs, not letting the Sikhs beyond the rank of a 'Major' and a full stop in commissioning the Muslims in the armed forces or not giving commission to any Muslim, etc. The Brahmins-Hindus armed forces chronically lack the leadership. The Chief(s) of army have been involved in the cases of 'real estate' irregularity and mistrust, along with more than 12% vacancies at the 'commissioned ranks' and there has been problems in the enrollment at the 'Non-commissioned and Junior Commissioned ranks'.

Following the politicizing 'judiciary', the 'Brahmins-Hindus alleged democracy' has politicized the armed forces and other para-military agencies also. Besides armed forces, the Bollywood culture has affected the 'Brahmins-Hindus and their followers so badly that they do not think beyond the 'jean and bikni culture', along with the culture of the 'Brahmins-Hindus' present in the 'Caves of Ajanta, Ellora, etc.'

The Sikh Factor: It will work against the 'Brahmins-Hindus', because the Sikhs and entire world knows that the 'Brahmins-Hindus are the 'Butchers of our world', according to the founder of the Sikh religion, Guru Baba Nanak Sahib, as inscribed in the Sikh scripture, Guru Granth Sahib. The deeds of the 'Brahmins-Hindus NDA are self-explanatory, because of their treatments with the non-Brahmins-Hindus, the Sikhs, Muslims in general, the Christians and other non-Brahmins-Hindus.

The turbaned 'Brahmins-Hindus' in 'The Sikh Identity' have deliberately disturbed the 'Education of the Sikh children in the 'Landless Sikh Nation,PUNJAB'. Here, the turbaned 'Brahmins-Hindus' are bound to suffer and bury themselves in the graves they have dug up to follow blindly the 'Butchers of Mankind'. These turbaned 'Brahmins-Hindus' are like a product achieved from the 'cross of a crow and swan'.

The Sikh Factor as it has been discussed above, the author would suggest to the NDA's prime enemy, Islamic Republic of Pakistan, not to feel over confident in any way. Rather, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, as the author would like to see, should be ready to face any kind of 'unforeseen' eventuality(ies). It would be best for the great Awam of Pakistan to strengthen their democratic institutions by the qualitative administration and administrative machinery.

The Sikh Factor will play a positive role in the developments of South Asia, as the Sikhs had been the 'First Sovereign and Secular' nation of South Asia, 1799 to 14th March, 1849. The author would have to ask to think more carefully that the ‘Brahmins-Hindus’ dare not to face China? The weak hearted creatures who had been claiming for 40+ years as their own, despite their claims they politely and quitely surrendered to China by their criminal Chief, Council of Ministers, the New Delhi administration, AB Vajpayee.

The decade of 2000 and onwards are highly unpredictable. As such, the 'Brahmins-Hindus' neighbours should do adequate preparatory work to preserve their political borders under adversary situations.

The Sikh Factor would prevail far more determined than ever, because the Sikhs have had enough deceits and false promises. Now on they will talk business. The cards will 'never' be in the hands of turbaned Brahmins-Hindus in 'The Sikh Identity', illiterate jathedars/band leaders, pseudo-saints, derewalas, entertainers (singers, performers, granthis, hymn singers/keertanyes, etc.) and anti-Sikh Nation people. Rather, the Sikh youth, and seasoned and experienced Sikhs will have to control the affairs of their 'Landless Sikh Nation, PUNJAB' (under the NDA occupation since 15th August, 1947).

In summation, should a confrontation occur, it would be more favourable to the non-Brahmins-Hindus. Such a confrontation may wipe out the dreams of the 'Brahmins-Hindus' and their alleged Indian democracy.

Sincerely,

Awatar Singh Sekhon (Machaki)
Editor in Chief
International Journal of Sikh Affairs ISSN 1481-5435

THE SIKHS: SOVEREIGNTY TO SLAVERY by Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon ISBN 978-0-9811360-8-0

NEWLY RELEASED

THE SIKHS: SOVEREIGNTY TO SLAVERY*

by

Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon

ISBN 978-0-9811360-8-0

Price: US$15.00 plus postage and handling charges

E-mail:

* A publication of The Sikh Educational Trust

Box 60246

University of Alberta Postal Outlet

EDMONTON, AB T6G 2S5

CANADA

*****

Dr. Manmohan Singh, a 'Selected but not elected' prime minister of the 'Brahmins-Hindus' alleged Indian democracy by Habib Yousafzai

Dr. Manmohan Singh, a 'Selected but not elected' prime minister of the 'Brahmins-Hindus' alleged Indian democracy

Habib Yousafzai

Sirdar Gurmit Singh Khalsa comments, If you recall that after the slavery of about (900) years, India got Independence on 15 August 1947, and since then the Indian Governments have been resorting to "terrorism" through its military and other law-enforcement forces. Look! How India 'swallowed' the part of Kashmir, Punjab (the Landless Sikh Nation, Khalistan), Pepsu, Hyderabad, Pondicherry, Goa, Sikkim and now due its Nuclear capacity, India intends to control Bangladesh, Burma, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Afghanistan with the connivance of USA/Russia/Israel ???

Minorities in India are worse than slaves. Have the Sikhs forgotten attacks on Darbaar Sahib Complex, including Akaal Takht Sahib, in June 1984 followed by killings of Sikhs in November 1984 and onwards; Demolishing of Muslims' Babri Mosque on 6 December 1992, destruction of several Christian Churches, treatment of Shudras/Dalits under the garb of Manu-Simiriti, which is considered to be higher than The Constitution of India? Then what Robot-like Dr. Manmohan Singh, could do?

We may also recollect that under the corrupt regime of the Indian P. M. P. V. Narasimha Rao (from 21 June 1991 to 16 May 1996), Dr. Manmohan Singh was his Finance Minister. In the Book "25 Years After 1984 Assault on Durbar Sahib Laying the Foundation of Khalistan", published by London Institute of South Asia, it is mentioned on page119 "Manmohan Singh, the present Prime Minister of India, is not an elected 'Member of Parliament' (MP) from any electoral constituency of India. He is supposed to be an honest and clean person. However, in his address before the World Conference on Human Rights Delegates in Vienna, Austria, on 24th June (14 to 25th June), 1993, he, then Finance Minister of the PV Rao administration, said, "I being a Sikh find no abuse of Human Rights of Sikhs much less any minorities in India.” What a lie.

As a matter of fact the example of Indian government is as the saying goes that we have every respect for the judgment of the ombudsman (Mukhia/Sarpanch a person who decides the community disputes) but we cannot alter the drain which is falling on the neighbour’s backyard.